Face and Content Validity of an Artificial Eye Model for Secondary IOL Fixation

Author Details

David Loewen, Abdullah Al-Ani, Michael Penny, Andrew Swift, Adam Gorner, Patrick Gooi

Journal Details

Published

Published: 4 March 2021 | Article Type :

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the face and content validity of the use of artificial eye models (SimulEYE Iris Suturing & IOL model, InsEYEt, Westlake Village, CA) in training physicians the techniques required for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Secondary IOL fixation, or secondary IOL implantation, is a common yet technically challenging skill useful in the treatment of primary IOL implantation failure, zonular instability, or aphakia related to trauma or surgery.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight ophthalmologists at the 2019 Canadian Ophthalmology Society annual meeting underwent a secondary IOL fixation wet-lab using artificial eye models. The technique was scleral suturing of a single piece IOL with via 4 closed-loop haptics. All of the ophthalmologists were given an 18-response survey immediately following the training session which were composed of statements which addressed the face and content validity of the artificial eyes. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from (5) strongly agree to (1) strongly disagree. Mann-Whitney U analysis compared instructor versus non-instructor and expert versus non-expert respondent responses.

Results: Respondents rated all statements regarding the model with a median response of 3 (Neither Agree or Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Mann-Whitney U analysis did not show a significant difference in responses for expert versus non-expert and instructor vs non-instructor respondents for any of the survey statements. The artificial eye received highest ratings for its usefulness for training residents, ease of set-up and clean-up compared to cadaveric models and how using the model is a better way to learn the procedure than discussion or observation and will likely result in future surgical success. The lowest survey ratings were for the model’s realism when compared to human cadaveric models.

Conclusions: The artificial eye model was generally regarded highly by ophthalmologists with all levels of experience performing secondary IOL fixation. These results suggest that this artificial eye may be a valuable tool for teaching secondary IOL fixation in competency-based ophthalmology education programs. 

Keywords: Secondary IOL Fixation; SimulEYE; Simulation eye; artificial eye; competency based learning.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

Statistics

171 Views

281 Downloads

Volume & Issue

Article Type

How to Cite

Citation:

David Loewen, Abdullah Al-Ani, Michael Penny, Andrew Swift, Adam Gorner, Patrick Gooi. (2021-03-04). "Face and Content Validity of an Artificial Eye Model for Secondary IOL Fixation." *Volume 4*, 1, 1-7